Note to Selves: Bakhtin and Wittgenstein: Information, Meaning, and Understanding

Thinking out loud here, no pun intended. It seems to me that a close look at the commonalities between Bakhtin’s and Wittgenstein’s philosophy of language can help bring greater clarity to information, meaning, and understanding, and potentially answer the following three questions posed by Luciano Floridi’s Philosophy of Information:

1. Can an informational approach solve the mind-body problem?
2. Could epistemology be based on a theory of information?
3. What is the ontological status of information?

I don’t believe Searle understands Wittgenstein, not deeply anyway. That, or Searle continues to beg the question, e.g., “Nevertheless I still think there can be an X.”